Code Review
A senior-level read of an existing codebase - what is solid, what is fragile, and what will cause problems the moment you try to grow on top of it.
For teams inheriting code from a previous contractor, or founders about to hire a new team and wanting a second opinion first.
See detailed information
Read the codebase like we will maintain it
Architecture, dependencies, test coverage (or the lack of it), and code quality reviewed the way we would if we were about to take over the project ourselves.
Flag what is actually risky
Not a style-guide nitpick list - the handful of decisions that will genuinely cause outages, security issues, or expensive rework if they are not addressed.
Check it against what you are planning to build next
A codebase can be fine for what exists and still be the wrong foundation for what you want to add. We evaluate it against your actual roadmap, not in a vacuum.
A clear, written verdict
A report you can hand to your team, your new contractor, or keep for yourself - plain language, prioritised, with a realistic view of what fixing it involves.