GRND
/03]

Legacy Rebuild

When an audit shows the foundation genuinely will not hold, we rebuild the parts that need it - reusing everything that still works, replacing only what does not.

Not a rewrite for its own sake. We rebuild what is actually broken, and we say so plainly when a full rebuild is not the right call.

See detailed information
TitleDescription

Start from the audit findings, not from zero

The rebuild scope is grounded in what the audit already found - we do not re-litigate what is salvageable, we act on it.

Rebuild in slices, not all at once

The riskiest or most broken part gets rebuilt first, released, and validated - before moving to the next slice. The product stays usable throughout, where possible.

Carry over what already works

Data, integrations and the parts of the codebase that passed the audit get reused, not thrown out - a rebuild should cost less than starting over, not the same.

Release and stabilise

A real release, with the monitoring and documentation the original build may not have had - so the next team, whoever that is, is not back here in a year.